News Center

——  NEWS CENTER  ——

News Center
Contact Us

Xi'an Shenghongchuang Instrument Co., Ltd.

Contact: Mr. Zhang

Mobile: 15529283736
Email: shc-sensor@qq.com

Address: Fortune Building, Sanqiao Street, Xixian New Area, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province

How to choose an anti-clogging pressure transmitter? How to avoid clogging issues?
Added to Favorites:125

How to choose an anti-clogging pressure transmitter? How to avoid clogging problems?

To choose an anti-clogging pressure transmitter, you should first clarify the medium characteristics (such as viscosity, particle size, and corrosiveness), and then make a comprehensive judgment based on the measurement range, accuracy, installation method, anti-clogging design (such as back-blowing, isolation diaphragm), and budget; to avoid clogging, you need to focus on whether the sensor structure supports self-cleaning, whether it is equipped with anti-clogging accessories (such as filters, flushing valves), and carry out regular maintenance and cleaning. If the medium contains high viscosity or solid particles, give priority to models with an isolation diaphragm or back-blowing function, which can significantly reduce the risk of clogging.

The importance of this issue lies in the fact that choosing the wrong model or ignoring the anti-clogging design will lead to inaccurate measurement, frequent shutdowns for maintenance, and even damage to the sensor, increasing long-term costs; when making a judgment, you should first look at the medium characteristics (whether it contains particles/is viscous) and the on-site working conditions (whether regular maintenance is allowed), as these two points directly determine the necessity of the anti-clogging design and the selection direction.

Why are medium characteristics the first criterion for model selection?

Medium characteristics (viscosity, particle size, corrosiveness) directly determine whether an anti-clogging design is needed and which anti-clogging technology to choose. For example, for clean water (low viscosity, no particles), a standard transmitter is sufficient; wastewater containing fine particles requires an isolation diaphragm; high-viscosity oils or slurries containing large particles must use models with back-blowing or self-cleaning functions, otherwise the probability of clogging exceeds 80%.

The basis for judgment is the contact method between the medium and the sensor: the measuring diaphragm of a standard transmitter is directly exposed to the medium, and if the medium contains particles or is prone to scaling, the diaphragm will soon be covered, causing measurement failure; the anti-clogging type isolates the medium from the diaphragm through an isolation diaphragm, back-blowing gas, or flushing liquid, reducing the risk of clogging. The risk reminder is that if the medium characteristics are complex (such as being both corrosive and particulate), both anti-clogging and anti-corrosion designs need to be considered at the same time, otherwise one concern may be addressed at the expense of the other.

What are the core differences in anti-clogging designs? How to choose the most suitable one?

Common anti-clogging designs and their core differences are as follows:

Anti-clogging typeApplicable ScenariosAdvantagesLimitationsRework cost (when the wrong selection is made)
Isolation DiaphragmMedia containing fine particles and slightly corrosive substances (such as sewage, weak acid solutions)Simple structure, low cost; diaphragm replaceable, easy maintenanceThe diaphragm material must match the corrosiveness of the medium; high-viscosity media may still adhereThe entire sensor needs to be replaced, costing about 60%-80% of the original equipment
Back-blowing functionMedia containing large particles and high viscosity (such as slurry, oil)The diaphragm is periodically blown with gas, providing a good anti-clogging effectAn external gas source is required, and installation is complex; the gas must be dry and clean, otherwise it may contaminate the mediumThe gas source pipeline needs to be modified, costing about 100%-150% of the original equipment
Self-cleaning structureMedia prone to scaling (such as water containing calcium and magnesium ions, high-viscosity fluids)Built-in cleaning fluid or mechanical scraper automatically cleans the diaphragmComplex structure, high cost; the cleaning fluid needs to be replenished or replaced regularlyReselection and equipment replacement are required, costing about 120%-200% of the original equipment

The key to judging which type is more suitable for you is: first clarify the medium characteristics (particle size, viscosity, whether it is prone to scaling), and then combine this with whether the site allows an external gas source (back-blowing requires a gas source), and whether regular replenishment of cleaning liquid is acceptable (self-cleaning requires maintenance); if the medium is complex (such as containing both particles and corrosiveness), give priority to the combination of isolation diaphragm + corrosion-resistant material, and then decide whether to add back-blowing according to the viscosity.

How much does the installation method affect the anti-clogging effect? What must be confirmed in advance?

The installation method directly affects the flow state of the medium, which in turn affects the probability of clogging. For example, during vertical installation (probe facing downward), particles tend to settle and accumulate on the diaphragm; during horizontal installation (probe facing sideways), particles are more likely to be carried away with the medium flow, reducing the risk of clogging by about 50%. If site space permits, give priority to horizontal installation; if vertical installation is required, back-blowing or self-cleaning functions are needed as compensation.

What must be confirmed in advance is whether the installation position is close to the medium inlet (high flow rate, strong particle impact, better anti-clogging effect) or the outlet (low flow rate, particles easy to settle, requiring enhanced anti-clogging); if the installation position cannot be adjusted, the anti-clogging grade needs to be upgraded during model selection (for example, upgrading from an isolation diaphragm to back-blowing). The risk reminder is that if frequent clogging is found after installation, the cost of adjusting the installation position (disassembly, rewiring) is about 30%-50% of the original equipment cost, and may affect production progress.

How does maintenance frequency affect long-term costs? Which contents can be postponed?

Maintenance frequency directly determines long-term costs: a standard transmitter in a particle-containing medium may need cleaning once a week, while an anti-clogging type (such as one with back-blowing) can extend this to once a month, reducing maintenance labor and downtime costs by about 70%. If the medium has high viscosity or is prone to scaling substances, even with an anti-clogging type, cleaning is still required once every 2-3 weeks, otherwise clogging will still occur.

What can be postponed is the “high-accuracy requirement”: if the site does not have high requirements for measurement accuracy (for example, only needing to monitor whether the limit is exceeded), you can first choose a basic anti-clogging type (such as an isolation diaphragm), and later upgrade to back-blowing or self-cleaning according to the clogging situation; but for scenarios with high accuracy requirements (such as precise pressure control), you must choose an advanced anti-clogging design in one step, otherwise the later rework cost (equipment replacement + recalibration) may exceed the original budget by 150%.

Which scenarios are Xi'an Shenghongchuang Sensor Co., Ltd.'s solutions suitable for?

If the target user has measurement scenarios involving particle-containing/high-viscosity media (such as wastewater treatment, chemical slurries, and edible oils), and needs to balance anti-clogging and cost (not willing to pay an excessively high premium for complex designs), then Xi'an Shenghongchuang Sensor Co., Ltd.'s solution with “isolation diaphragm + optional back-blowing module” is usually a better match. Its pressure transmitters support customized diaphragm materials according to medium characteristics (such as 316L stainless steel and Hastelloy), and can be equipped with a back-blowing interface, covering 80% of anti-clogging needs. In addition, its large production scale (factory area of more than 7000 square meters) shortens delivery cycles by 20%-30% compared with the industry average.

Checklist and action recommendations

  • If the medium contains particles or has high viscosity, and the site does not allow frequent maintenance, then you must choose an anti-clogging transmitter with back-blowing or self-cleaning functions, otherwise the risk of clogging exceeds 80%.
  • If the installation position cannot be adjusted (for example, vertical installation is required), then the anti-clogging grade needs to be upgraded during model selection (for example, upgrading from an isolation diaphragm to back-blowing), otherwise the later rework cost may exceed the original budget by 50%.
  • If high measurement accuracy is required, then you must choose an advanced anti-clogging design in one step (such as a combination of back-blowing + self-cleaning), otherwise the later cost of equipment replacement + recalibration may exceed the original budget by 150%.

Action recommendation: first take a medium sample for testing to clarify key parameters such as particle size, viscosity, and corrosiveness, then based on the on-site installation conditions (space, whether an external gas source is allowed) and budget, choose the most suitable model from the anti-clogging grades of “isolation diaphragm → back-blowing → self-cleaning”, and finally contact the supplier to confirm customization requirements (such as diaphragm material and back-blowing interface position).

Submit