News Center
—— NEWS CENTER ——
Xi'an Shenghongchuang Instrument Co., Ltd.
Contact: Mr. Zhang
Mobile: 15529283736
Email: shc-sensor@qq.com
Address: Fortune Building, Sanqiao Street, Xixian New Area, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province
When purchasing pressure transmitters, accuracy, measuring range, output signal, power supply method, process connection, and protection rating usually directly determine whether the equipment can be put into field use. If the delivered product is inconsistent with the contract, purchase order, technical agreement, or drawings confirmed by both parties—for example, the agreed accuracy is ±0.25%FS but the actual test result is ±0.8%FS; or the agreed range is 0-1.6MPa but the actual nameplate or output corresponds to 0-1.0MPa—the purchaser may, in principle, request return, replacement, repair, or compensation.
However, "technical specifications not meeting requirements" does not mean that a return can be made directly in every case. Actual liability determination must be based on traceable agreement documents and assessed comprehensively in conjunction with acceptance results, test methods, operating conditions, and the time when the issue occurred. For industrial instruments, factors such as incorrect field installation, medium blockage, overpressure shock, electromagnetic interference, and power supply fluctuations may also cause abnormal measurements. Product nonconformity cannot be determined solely based on a single reading.
Xi'an Shenghongchuang Instrumentation Co., Ltd. and its production base, Shaanxi Qinkong Sensor Technology Co., Ltd., recommend that both purchasers and suppliers document key performance indicators in writing before placing orders for industrial measurement and control products such as pressure, level, differential pressure, weighing, displacement, temperature and humidity, and flow products. Establishing acceptance standards in advance can reduce delivery disputes and avoid model selection deviations caused by insufficient descriptions of field operating conditions.
For procurement personnel, the most effective basis for safeguarding their rights is not a general statement that "the product is not easy to use," but the establishment of a four-part evidence chain: "contractual agreement, physical product, test records, and communication evidence." When evidence is complete, the processing efficiency of returns, replacements, or technical remedies will improve significantly.
Whether the parameters of a pressure transmitter meet requirements should first be checked against the version of the technical agreement confirmed by both parties. A purchase contract stating only "a batch of pressure transmitters" is insufficient to cover complete acceptance requirements. It is recommended to also specify the measuring range, accuracy class, output signal, wetted material, connection specification, temperature range, supply voltage, display requirements, and explosion-proof requirements. For export or project-supporting orders, certificates, label language, packaging method, and delivery documents should also be clearly defined.
For example, a 4-20mA two-wire output and a 0-10V three-wire output cannot replace each other; G1/4 threads and M20×1.5 threads may be impossible to assemble directly even if they appear similar; and 316L stainless steel wetted parts differ from ordinary stainless steel in corrosion resistance. As long as these items are clearly specified in written documents and the delivered product is inconsistent, the purchaser has a sufficient basis for objection.
For accuracy disputes, attention should be paid to how accuracy is expressed. ±0.5%FS means calculated based on full scale. If the range is 0-10MPa, the allowable error is generally understood as ±0.05MPa; whereas ±0.5%RD is related to the actual reading. If the supplier and purchaser have not agreed on the error calculation basis, subsequent testing may easily lead to disputes due to different standards even where deviations exist.
If the seller changes the sensing element, circuit design, process connection, or range configuration without authorization, and the change affects equipment assembly, accuracy, or safe use, the purchaser may require restoration of the agreed configuration. For products that cannot be restored, have already affected project milestones, or pose safety risks, return is generally more appropriate than on-site modification.
Upon delivery, first inspect the integrity of the packaging, product model, nameplate information, certificate of conformity, calibration records, instruction manual, and accessory list. If the outer packaging is damp, impacted or deformed, the terminal box is damaged, or the aviation connector is loose, take photos at the time of receipt and retain them, and note the abnormalities on the logistics receipt or receiving record. Transportation damage and manufacturing quality issues have different responsible parties, so securing evidence as early as possible is more advantageous.
When testing accuracy, linearity, and output signals, use a standard pressure source, digital pressure calibrator, or testing equipment with traceability that has a higher accuracy class. In general, the allowable error of verification equipment should be clearly lower than the specification of the transmitter being tested. Taking a Class 0.25 pressure transmitter as an example, conclusions obtained using instruments with comparable or lower accuracy often lack credibility.
Routine acceptance testing may be performed at five pressure points of 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%, for both increasing and decreasing pressure cycles, recording the corresponding current, voltage, or digital communication data. The theoretical value for a 4-20mA output can be linearly converted according to the measuring range; for example, 50% of the range generally corresponds to 12mA. If multiple test points continuously exceed tolerance after excluding the effects of power supply, wiring, and load, the product may initially be determined to have abnormal performance.
It should be noted that if a transmitter has been exposed for an extended period after installation to pulsating pressure, frequent pressure shocks, medium crystallization, pressure port blockage, or ambient temperatures beyond limits, abnormal output does not necessarily mean that its factory parameters were nonconforming. Before requesting a return, the purchaser should retain records of the installation location, medium characteristics, actual pressure, supply voltage, and control system wiring to facilitate rapid assessment by the manufacturer.
If the nameplate model, measuring range, output signal, or connection differs from the order, this constitutes a relatively clear incorrect-delivery issue. The purchaser should notify the supplier in writing within a reasonable acceptance period, stop installation and secondary processing, and properly store unused products, packaging, and accessories. In such cases, replacement can generally be negotiated as a priority. If the incorrect delivery prevents the equipment from going online and the delivery schedule cannot be met, a return may be claimed and the supplier may be required to bear the corresponding direct losses.
If the model is correct but the accuracy, stability, or sealing performance does not meet the agreement, test results are required as the basis. The manufacturer will generally first conduct a technical review and, where necessary, arrange factory-return testing or third-party testing. For products that can be restored through calibration, replacement of sensing elements, or repair, both parties may prioritize repair; for products with repeated out-of-tolerance results, batch consistency issues, or an inability to meet project requirements after repair, replacement or return is more reasonable.
If the information provided by the purchaser regarding the medium, temperature, maximum pressure, installation space, and other factors is incomplete, resulting in failure to identify high-temperature, high-pressure, corrosive, or high-interference conditions during model selection, this may constitute a selection deviation. For example, if a normal-temperature pressure transmitter is used in a 150℃ medium environment, or a product with an ordinary range is continuously subjected to more than 1.5 times its rated pressure, responsibility for drift or damage must be specifically apportioned based on communication records between both parties.
For accuracy drift occurring after 6 months of use, it is not appropriate to simply disregard it on the grounds that the receipt period has expired. The warranty period, cumulative operating conditions, periodic calibration records, and whether there are signs of overpressure, lightning strikes, water ingress, or other issues should be checked. If significant drift occurs under normal operating conditions, the manufacturer should participate in fault analysis; if it is confirmed that the operating environment exceeds the product's design range, repair, model upgrading, or on-site protection modification should be the primary solutions.
First, the acceptance period should be clearly defined. For standard products, it may be agreed that appearance, model, and basic power-on checks will be completed within 7 working days after delivery; for products involving project commissioning or complex operating-condition verification, a performance observation period of 30 to 90 days may be agreed. The acceptance period should not merely state "subject to acceptance by Party A"; acceptance items, testing tools, and the method for raising objections should also be specified.
Second, performance criteria should be clearly defined. It is recommended to include the accuracy class, temperature drift range, response time, overload capacity, insulation performance, allowable output error, and test environment. For different output methods such as 4-20mA, 0-5V, 0-10V, and RS485 Modbus, wiring definitions and communication address rules should be included in the appendix to avoid misjudgments during control system integration.
Third, the sequence and time limits for handling nonconforming products should be clearly defined. For example, the supplier shall respond within 48 hours after receiving a written objection and complete a preliminary technical assessment within 5 working days; after confirming that the product does not comply with the agreement, the supplier shall provide a replacement, repair, or refund solution within the agreed time. For procurement with tight project schedules, the purchaser may require the supplier to send replacements first and then process returned-product testing.
The fourth through sixth items include: clarifying the principles for bearing return and replacement freight as well as disassembly and installation costs; clarifying the warranty start date and the definition of human-caused damage; and clarifying the third-party testing institution and the rules for bearing testing costs. The more specific these terms are, the more effectively procurement, technical, finance, and after-sales teams can proceed according to unified standards when issues arise, without repeatedly communicating around verbal commitments.
Before procurement, provide the manufacturer with actual operating conditions: measuring medium, normal pressure, peak pressure, temperature range, installation method, whether pulsation exists, whether corrosive conditions are present, field power supply conditions, and the control system interface. Range selection should generally take into account both the normal operating range and pressure fluctuations. Long-term operation close to full scale is not recommended, nor should the range be selected excessively large at the expense of low-pressure resolution.
For bulk purchases or automated production line projects, it is recommended to conduct sample confirmation first. After completing assembly, signal commissioning, stability observation, and actual-medium testing with 1 to 3 samples, batch production can then be arranged. This can identify issues involving connection orientation, cable length, display orientation, communication protocol, and installation space in advance, avoiding concentrated rework after dozens or even hundreds of units are delivered.
When selecting a manufacturer, do not compare only the unit price. Production capacity, calibration equipment, quality traceability, non-standard response capability, and after-sales efficiency should also be considered. Suppliers with standardized production and full-process quality control capabilities can form a closed loop across raw material selection, precision machining, program commissioning, accuracy calibration, finished-product testing, and factory acceptance, reducing the risk of batch parameter fluctuations.
When the technical specifications of a pressure transmitter fail to meet requirements, the purchaser may claim a return in accordance with the law and the agreement, provided that the agreement is clear, testing is reliable, evidence is complete, and responsibility can be distinguished. Improving the technical agreement before procurement, conducting timely acceptance after receipt, retaining original data when abnormalities occur, and contacting the supplier as soon as possible can usually achieve a more reasonable resolution without affecting project progress.
If you are purchasing pressure transmitters or have encountered acceptance issues involving accuracy, measuring range, output signals, connection compatibility, or other matters, you may compile the product model, technical agreement, field operating conditions, and test data and communicate with the technical personnel of Xi'an Shenghongchuang Instrumentation Co., Ltd. to obtain targeted recommendations for selection verification, fault analysis, and after-sales handling.
Related Recommendations