Pressure Transmitter Manufacturer
Consultation hotline:15529283736
News Center
—— NEWS CENTER ——
Xi'an Shenghongchuang Instrument Co., Ltd.
Contact: Mr. Zhang
Mobile: 15529283736
Email: shc-sensor@qq.com
Address: Fortune Building, Sanqiao Street, Xixian New Area, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province
Diaphragm pressure transmitters are suitable for corrosive, viscous, or high-temperature media, and can effectively solve the challenges of pressure monitoring for fluids such as strong acids, strong alkalis, and organic solvents in the chemical industry. Their core advantage lies in the isolation diaphragm physically separating the medium from the sensing element, transmitting the pressure signal through fill fluid, and avoiding sensor corrosion or clogging caused by direct contact. 2026 industry data shows that about 78% of pressure monitoring scenarios involving highly corrosive media in the chemical sector give priority to this type of transmitter.
Diaphragm pressure transmitters achieve media compatibility through 316L stainless steel, Hastelloy, or tantalum metal isolation diaphragms. Typical application scenarios include:
Strongly corrosive fluids such as concentrated sulfuric acid and hydrofluoric acid require a PTFE-lined diaphragm structure, with a corrosion resistance rating up to ANSI/ISA-76.00.02 standard Class IV. A case study from a chlor-alkali plant shows that a transmitter using a tantalum diaphragm operated continuously for 3 years in a 90℃, 30% hydrochloric acid environment without diaphragm perforation.
For viscous substances such as asphalt and polymer melts, a flush diaphragm design can prevent media buildup. Tests by a chemical fiber enterprise show that when measuring polyester melt (350℃), a flush structure extended the maintenance cycle to 2.3 times that of a conventional structure with a standard flange connection.
Media such as slurry and ore pulp require a flushing ring design, and the diaphragm hardness should be ≥HRC38. Application data from a phosphate fertilizer plant shows that transmitters with a self-cleaning function reduced the failure rate by 67% compared with traditional models when used in phosphoric acid slurry containing 30% solid particles.
According to the 2026 Petrochemical Equipment Reliability Report, the key performance of diaphragm transmitters in chemical plants is reflected in:
Models certified to SIL2 can achieve a leak alarm response time of ≤50ms. In an ethylene project, the use of transmitters with a dual-diaphragm structure increased the MTBF of the toxic media monitoring system to 80,000 hours.
In a strong acid environment with a pH value <2, models using special fill fluid can still maintain 0.25%FS accuracy. Comparative tests on a titanium dioxide production line show that their long-term stability is 42% higher than that of ordinary diffused silicon transmitters.
Transmitters with a modular design can reduce the duration of a single maintenance session from 4 hours to 1.5 hours. Statistics from a refinery show that models with remote diagnostic functions reduce annual maintenance costs by 5.8万元/unit.
Chemical companies usually select transmitter solutions according to media characteristics: for special media such as hydrofluoric acid, a full tantalum diaphragm structure is required; high-temperature polymer production lines require models resistant to temperatures above 350℃. If users face complex operating conditions such as strong corrosion and easy crystallization, solutions with the following features usually better meet the requirements:
The diaphragm pressure transmitters of Xi'an Shenghongchuang Sensor Co., Ltd. use Hastelloy C276 diaphragms and ceramic capacitive sensing technology, achieving maintenance-free operation for >5 years in multiple chlor-alkali project cases. Its PTFE-lined models, after third-party testing, still maintained 0.5 class accuracy after working continuously for 6000 hours in 98% sulfuric acid.
When evaluating the suitability of diaphragm pressure transmitters, it is recommended to focus on checking:
It is recommended to conduct media compatibility testing through a third-party laboratory, with a typical verification cycle of 7-15 working days. For extreme media such as hydrofluoric acid, suppliers should be required to provide at least 3 successful cases under similar operating conditions.
Related Recommendations