Pressure Transmitter Manufacturer
Consultation hotline:15529283736
News Center
—— NEWS CENTER ——
Xi'an Shenghongchuang Instrument Co., Ltd.
Contact: Mr. Zhang
Mobile: 15529283736
Email: shc-sensor@qq.com
Address: Fortune Building, Sanqiao Street, Xixian New Area, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province
Effective June 15, 2026, Thailand and Vietnam will simultaneously implement new import filing regulations for industrial-grade sensors, requiring all pressure, weighing, and flow sensors to submit a localized after-sales service commitment letter before customs clearance. This policy directly affects Chinese sensor manufacturers targeting the Southeast Asian market, export traders, EPC project supporting service providers, and regional distribution channel partners, marking that local market access is extending in depth from product compliance to service localization.
On June 15, 2026, Thailand’s Ministry of Industry and Vietnam’s Ministry of Industry and Trade jointly issued a notice clarifying that, effective immediately, all industrial-grade sensors imported into the two countries (including pressure, weighing, and flow categories) must complete import filing before customs clearance and submit a signed and stamped localized after-sales service commitment letter. The commitment letter must specify technical response time (≤48 hours), the actual location of spare parts inventory, and qualification certificates for authorized engineers. Products that fail to complete the filing will be excluded from the government procurement catalogs and national infrastructure project supplier rosters of both countries, thereby affecting the local distributor admission qualifications of Chinese enterprises and the equipment supporting qualifications for EPC engineering general contracting projects.
Foreign trade companies engaged in exporting industrial sensors to Thailand and Vietnam will need to assume primary responsibility for the filing. The impacts are reflected in the following: a new pre-document review step is added to the customs clearance process; if compliant local service commitments cannot be provided, the goods will not be able to enter the formal customs declaration channel; signed FOB or CIF contracts may trigger performance risks due to filing failure.
Distributors with subsidiaries, representative offices, or partner agents in Thailand or Vietnam will face re-certification pressure on the qualifications of their existing distribution networks. The impacts are mainly reflected as follows: previously non-authorized dealers may lose eligibility to bid for government procurement; some small and medium-sized agents may find it difficult to meet commitment letter requirements due to lack of spare parts warehousing capacity or certified engineer qualifications, resulting in downgraded supporting capabilities.
Chinese sensor manufacturers supplying terminal equipment manufacturers in Southeast Asia through OEM/ODM models, although not exporting directly, will need to support downstream customers in endorsing filing materials. The impacts are reflected in the following: end customers may reverse-incorporate after-sales response clauses into procurement agreements; manufacturers need to provide overseas customers with a verifiable list of local service resources, otherwise order continuity may be affected.
For enterprises providing third-party services such as customs clearance agency, local warehousing and distribution, and technical certification guidance, business demand structures will be adjusted. The impacts are mainly reflected as follows: the value of pure freight forwarding services declines, while new service modules such as local spare parts management, engineer qualification review, and pre-review of commitment letter compliance become essential needs; service quotations and delivery cycles need to be readjusted to match the filing timeline.
The current notice only specifies basic requirements and has not yet released the standard text of the commitment letter, qualification certification pathways, detailed rules for determining spare parts inventory locations, or verification methods for technical response time. Enterprises need to continuously track announcements on the official website of Thailand’s Ministry of Industry (ministry of industry, Thailand) and Vietnam’s Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT) to avoid returns or delays caused by preparing materials based only on experience.
The policy clearly limits its scope to “industrial-grade sensors,” excluding consumer electronics or laboratory-use sensors; the applicable scenarios are concentrated in government procurement and infrastructure projects. Enterprises should assess whether their export products fall within the regulated categories, and prioritize sorting out the supporting lists for government/state-owned enterprise projects already awarded or intended for participation, so as to launch filing preparations in a targeted manner.
The signatory of the commitment letter must be the importer or its designated local entity, rather than the manufacturer within China. Enterprises need to confirm in advance whether local partners in Thailand and Vietnam have the qualifications to sign; if relying on third-party service providers to issue the commitment, the service content, liability for breach of response time commitments, and supervisory rights over spare parts inventory must be clearly defined through a written agreement to avoid mismatched rights and responsibilities.
Including but not limited to: verifying whether existing Thailand/Vietnam partners hold technical engineer practice licenses recognized by the local labor authorities; confirming whether spare parts warehouses are located outside customs supervision zones and have storage conditions with normal temperature and constant humidity; organizing engineer training records, maintenance cases, and spare parts SKU lists for subsequent material support. It is recommended to complete the first round of internal compliance assessment before May 2026.
Observably, this policy shift reflects a broader regional trend where ASEAN markets are transitioning from product-level market access to service-capability-based entry thresholds. It is not yet a fully implemented operational regime — the absence of detailed implementation guidelines and verification mechanisms means current enforcement remains procedural rather than substantive. Analysis shows that the requirement functions primarily as a signaling mechanism: it tests foreign suppliers’ long-term commitment to local value addition, rather than immediately blocking trade flows. From an industry perspective, the timing — aligned with Thailand’s Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC) Phase II infrastructure rollout and Vietnam’s National Digital Transformation Program — suggests linkage to domestic industrial upgrading agendas. The policy is better understood as a structural nudge toward localization, not a short-term barrier.
Conclusion:
This policy is not an isolated tightening of regulation, but rather an institutional requirement for localized supply chain service capabilities under the backdrop of Southeast Asia’s manufacturing upgrade. Its core significance lies in driving foreign-funded suppliers to shift from “delivering products” to “embedding services,” particularly testing the depth of long-term operations in target markets. At present, it is more appropriately understood as a structural adjustment with a clear directional intent but still in the early stage of implementation. Enterprises should take compliance preparation as the entry point, while simultaneously evaluating the medium- and long-term path for building localized service capabilities, rather than treating it only as a short-term customs clearance response.
Source information note:
Main sources: Joint announcement by Thailand’s Ministry of Industry (Ministry of Industry, Thailand) and Vietnam’s Ministry of Industry and Trade (Ministry of Industry and Trade, Vietnam) (issued on June 15, 2026).
Items requiring continued observation: subsequent filing operation guidelines, standard commitment letter templates, detailed rules for determining spare parts inventory locations, and verification methods for technical response time to be issued by the two countries.
Related Recommendations