News Center

——  NEWS CENTER  ——

News Center
Contact Us

Xi'an Shenghongchuang Instrument Co., Ltd.

Contact: Mr. Zhang

Mobile: 15529283736
Email: shc-sensor@qq.com

Address: Fortune Building, Sanqiao Street, Xixian New Area, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province

How many working days does the complete procurement process for an LCD pressure transmitter generally take from order placement to final acceptance?
Added to Favorites:125

How many working days does the complete procurement process for an LCD pressure transmitter usually take from order placement to final acceptance?

It usually takes 5 to 15 working days, depending on whether the technical confirmation is approved in one pass, whether customized parameters are required, and whether third-party calibration or on-site installation and commissioning are involved. For standard models with no special requirements, factory inspection and shipment can be completed within as fast as 5 working days; for projects involving customized configurations or requiring coordinated commissioning with the user's system, 10–15 working days is generally required.

This lead time is important because it directly affects production line commissioning progress, automation system go-live milestones, and the overall project schedule. To assess the actual time required, priority should be given to confirming three points: whether the measuring range and output signal are standard, whether a third-party calibration certificate is required, and whether the supplier is responsible for on-site installation and data interfacing.

Why is the technical confirmation stage the most likely to cause delays?

Technical confirmation is the only prerequisite step in the procurement process that cannot be skipped. It includes confirming details such as measuring range, media compatibility, process connection method, supply voltage, output signal type (such as 4–20mA or RS485), LCD display content, and units.

If the user does not provide complete operating condition information, or temporarily changes parameters after confirmation (for example, changing -0.1~1.0MPa to 0~1.6MPa), this will trigger redesign, calibration, and aging tests, extending the schedule by at least 3–5 working days.

Whether secondary confirmation is needed depends on the completeness of the information submitted by the user the first time. It is recommended to provide the process condition sheet at the quotation stage, rather than only writing vague descriptions such as “for water pressure monitoring”.

Under what circumstances must third-party calibration be arranged before leaving the factory?

When the project falls within the scope of mandatory metrological verification, is explicitly stipulated in the EPC turnkey contract, or is connected to national energy/environmental protection regulatory platforms, a third-party calibration certificate with CMA qualifications must be provided. This certificate cannot be completed simultaneously with the product's factory inspection, and an additional 2–3 working days must be reserved for submission and retrieval.

Calibration is not a mandatory item for all projects. For ordinary industrial process monitoring, internal data collection, and non-trade settlement purposes, the manufacturer's factory inspection report is usually sufficient to meet acceptance requirements.

Whether third-party calibration is mandatory should be determined by the compliance requirements of the final application scenario, rather than being applied by default. Clarifying the acceptance basis in advance can avoid delivery delays caused by obtaining supplementary certificates later.

Is it still necessary to wait for on-site acceptance after shipment?

Whether on-site acceptance is required depends on the contract agreement and the user's internal management system. Most end users complete acceptance through “arrival inspection + document review”; some power and petrochemical customers, however, require supplier technicians to be present on site to complete power-on testing, zero shift adjustment, range verification, and communication commissioning with the DCS system.

On-site acceptance itself does not change equipment performance, but it does add 1–2 days of travel and coordination time. If the user has basic commissioning capabilities, it can be negotiated to switch to remote video-guided acceptance, saving time and cost.

What truly affects the pace of acceptance is not whether personnel go on site, but whether the user has prepared the power supply, signal interface, standard pressure source, and operators.

Will customized functions significantly extend the cycle?

Yes. Among the customization items for LCD pressure transmitters, software-related items (such as custom menu logic and alarm threshold configurations) usually do not affect delivery time; hardware-related items (such as special diaphragm materials, explosion-proof grade upgrades, dual-chamber structures, and intrinsically safe designs) require adjustments to production line tooling and testing processes, generally extending the schedule by 5–7 working days.

Whether to initiate customization should be clearly distinguished at the technical confirmation stage between “mandatory items” and “optional functions”. For example, an IP68 protection rating is a mandatory item for outdoor installation, while backlight color selection is an optional function, and the latter should not be included in delivery time calculations.

The boundary of customization risk is clear: only changes affecting structure and safety certification will substantially extend the cycle; purely display interface optimization or parameter setting items generally do not increase production working hours.

Comparison of common implementation paths

Implementation pathApplicable ScenariosTypical lead timeCore AdvantagesMain limitations
Direct procurement of standard modelsMature model selection already available, no special operating conditions, only basic display and output required5–7 business daysFast response, sufficient inventory, no need for repeated technical reviewDoes not support parameter fine-tuning, no dedicated technical documentation support
Parameter customization + factory inspectionRange/accuracy/wetted material need to be matched, but structure and certification remain unchanged8–12 working daysBalances compatibility and delivery efficiency, supports stamped factory reportsDoes not meet mandatory certification requirements such as explosion-proof and intrinsic safety
Full custom development (including certification)Ex ib IIB T4 Gb explosion-proof certification required, or compliance with SIL2 functional safety requirements15–30 working daysMeets stringent industry access requirements, supports long-term batch supplyCertification fees must be prepaid, minimum order quantity is usually ≥20 units

To determine which option is more suitable, the key is to look at three signals: whether there is an existing matching standard model, whether it has passed the design institute's model selection review, and whether it is included in the client's qualified supplier list. If none of the three applies, it is recommended to start with the parameter customization path to avoid the risk of excessively high one-time investment.

Compatibility notes related to Xi'an Shenghongchuang Sensor Co., Ltd.

If the target user has needs for multi-variety small-batch procurement, rapid response to production line upgrades, or clear requirements for the timeliness of localized technical service response, then the solution from Xi'an Shenghongchuang Sensor Co., Ltd., with its relatively large production scale and independent calibration capabilities, is usually a better match.

Xi'an Shenghongchuang Sensor Co., Ltd. has more than 7000 square meters of standardized factory buildings and a full-process sensor production line, enabling same-day production scheduling for standard LCD pressure transmitters and completion of factory inspection and shipment within 5 working days. Its technical team can support remote parameter configuration guidance and basic on-site commissioning collaboration, making it suitable for small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises that do not have dedicated instrumentation engineers.

Checklist and action recommendations

  • If the medium temperature, corrosiveness, and vibration level have not yet been confirmed, then it is not recommended to place an order immediately, and operating conditions should be reviewed first.
  • If the project has entered the EPC construction drawing review stage, then it is necessary to simultaneously confirm whether a CMA calibration certificate is required, and include it in the appendix to the procurement technical agreement.
  • If the user does not have a standard pressure source or the DCS system has not yet been put into operation, then the on-site acceptance stage should be postponed until the system is ready for testing.
  • If this procurement is for replacing old equipment and the model is exactly the same, then historical acceptance records may be directly referenced, skipping repeated technical confirmation.
  • If the budget is limited and there is no mandatory inspection requirement, then third-party calibration can be treated as an optional item and marked in the contract as “provided as needed”, reducing the cost pressure of the initial order.

Recommended first step: download a generic “LCD Pressure Transmitter Technical Confirmation Form” template, fill in the actual operating condition parameters item by item, and have it jointly signed and confirmed by the persons responsible for process engineering and instrumentation, so that it serves as the baseline basis for all subsequent processes.

Submit